Rotman School of Management

Main Content

Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics and Board Effectiveness
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics and Board Effectiveness

Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics and Board Effectiveness

Measuring and setting standards for Canadian governance best practices

The Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics and Board Effectiveness (CCBE) is the locus of corporate governance research and communications at the Rotman School of Management. Our mandate is to monitor Canadian corporate governance trends and to provide guidance to firms looking to improve their board effectiveness and disclosure.

All talk, no action? Considering the effects of CSA disclosure amendments on the representation of women on S&P/TSX 60 boards

Click here to read the full report

The CSA now requires Canadian issuers to either disclose formal diversity policies for their boards of directors, or explain why they haven't got a policy.  CCBE examined the impact of the "Comply or Explain" requirement on the diversity of Canada's largest public issuers and found that improvements in the representation of women on boards continues to improve slowly, but Comply or Explain doesn't appear to be a sufficient motivator on its own.  In this partnership with Hansell LLP, we examine current trends in the representation of women on Canadian boards, and the impact, or lack thereof, of current regulatory requirements.


2017 Board Shareholder Confidence Index

Company Scores & Complete Scoring Criteria

Developed in spring 2003, the Board Shareholder Confidence Index comprises factors often used by active shareholders to assess Boards of Directors. While there are other variables not in our model that contribute to the effectiveness of Boards -- including elements that can only be observed from inside the boardroom -- we capture factors affecting shareholders’ confidence in the Boards’ abilities to fulfill their duties. These factors are different from the TSX Guidelines for effective corporate governance in that they take into account the shareholders’ perception of risk. Based on factors available to those outside the walls of the boardroom, we evaluate and rank Boards of Directors by their potential to act in an effective way and by their performance, as indicated by past practices. The score is developed using four linked steps.

The result is a transparent, objective, and adaptable rating system that assigns companies listed on the S&P/TSX Composite Index a score out of 150.


2017 - Why Family Business Success Matters for Canada

Private Family Business Governance Survey Report

Click here to download the report

Our survey results take us one step closer to understanding the diversity of governance needs among family businesses. Through further engagement with owners, directors and managers, the development of tools and resources that are sensitive to these needs will finally become a reality.

Clarkson Centre for Board Effectiveness in partnership with the Institute of Corporate Directors: Ontario Chapter

Media Release Available


2016 Board Shareholder Confidence Index

S&P/TSX Composite Index Scores -Complete Scoring Criteria


 2015 Board Shareholder Confidence Index

S&P/TSX Composite Index Scores - Complete Scoring Criteria


The Long View: Canada's First Family Firm Board Ratings (2015)

Read the Full Report -Complete Scoring Criteria


Board Shareholder Confidence Index (2014)

S&P/TSX Composite Index Scores -Complete Scoring Criteria

2014 marks the Thirteenth edition of the BSCI, and we continue to see improvement among S&P/TSX Composite Index firms. The CCBE recognizes the generous support of the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan toward our annual publication of the BSCI.


Clarkson Centre and INSEAD: Comparing Corporate Governance in Canada and the EU

The Clarkson Centre for Board Effectiveness collaborated with the INSEAD Corporate Governance Initiative to compare corporate governance in Canada and the EU.  The adoption of best practices has been much faster in Canada than in Europe.  This is evident in areas as diverse as director renewal, board evaluation and time allocation.


Canadian Director Compensation Analysis 2009-12

In the US, Mercer reports that director compensation has increased partially due to increased market regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts, as well as increased time commitments by boards.In this report I explore the changes in Canadian director compensation on the S&P/TSX Composite Index between 2009 and 2012 in the wake of the Financial Crisis. 


2013 CEO/Chair Structure in Canada Compared to the US 


2013 Canadian Director Tenure Report

How long is the average director tenure on the S&P/TSX Composite Index?  How does it compare to the U.S. and the U.K?


BOARD SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE INDEX 2013

BOARD SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE INDEX 2013 METHODOLOGY


David Beatty Appointed to the Order of Canada

David Beatty, Conway Director of the Clarkson Centre was recently appointed to the Order of Canada.  Congratulations David!

Family Firm Performance Study

The Clarkson Centre's new study shows that Canada's family firms have outperformed their widely-held counterparts over the past 20 years.


S&P/TSX 60 Pay for Performance Study

The Clarkson Centre studied the alignment between CEO pay and TSR on the TSX 60 between 2004 and 2011.  Click the header above for our full results and reports on each individual issuer


Board Shareholder Confidence Index (BSCI) 2012

BOARD SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE INDEX 2012 METHODOLOGY


Publications: 2011-12

July 2012

Pay for Performance Observations 2011

April 2012

Majority Voting in Canada 2006-2011 

March 2012

Before and After Say on Pay in Canada: 2009- 2011 

December 2011

2011 Board Shareholder Confidence Ratings

November 2011

SME Toolkit #3: Succession Planning

September 2011

SME Toolkit #2: Creating Your Board Manual

Majority Voting in Canada: 2006-2010

May 2011

SME Toolkit #1: Optimizing Board Skills and Meeting Effectiveness

© Rotman School of ManagementAASCB